>>829
I was working on the info that was in this thread exclusively, my dude. By all means assert the conclusion you had already arrived to, just don't phrase it like you're not 100% sure about it.
>you really think pedo is that much of a stretch here?
Anything's a stretch without compelling evidence.
Anyway, my main point was that the pampers thing is clearly a reference, not something that was meant to be a secret nod to those "in the know". It's not
>extremely similar to the one for Pampers
It literally IS the one for Pampers.
>Maybe you should read more threads on kiwifarms.
No, I'm fine, thanks
So, what's the plan?