/94/ - site meta discussion

gentlemander_banner.png
[Hide] (423.7KB, 900x300)

hey er, who em, who's ready for a brand shitty banner that I just did and am starting to regret because it's dumb as fuck

because here it is

>>344
BANNERS YES OMG THANK YOU

>>317
ikr its hard to beat raw arutistic talent like this

94meta.png
[Hide] (83.2KB, 600x200)

>>313
here, have a fucking bespoke banner catering to your own personal tastes

Fw7PefYWcAEe2P4.jpeg
[Hide] (85.2KB, 1080x1080)

I'm pretty happy about it. Still wish some features would be added but I can't complain. Praises are functionality, looks, and the dev is pretty cool. Complaints are lack of certain features. 

94chan used to run on Kusaba X and it was a nightmare. I did like Lynxchan at first, but then I found jschan and decided I wanted it. I'd say jschan is much better maintained, but that's just my opinion. I also really liked doushio and meguca, but lack of features led me away from those. jschan has what I want for the most part.

Nothing else to add, really. And I don't really see this site going anywhere as a result of anything. I've been the original owner since 2008 and ran it a few years before someone surprised me with the domain in 2021 as a present, and I've put a lot of work into it. 

I hope I answered your questions.

ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (1MB, 1200x1233)

>>348
Thank you for the response. 

I was admin/mod for a website that closed down after nearly a decade and we utilized TinyIB, then Vichan, and then Lynx. I also liked lynx,  especially the feature that allowed you to perform moderation tasks from the overboard. Something it seems everyone lacks. 

Does jschan let you moderate from the overboard, or do you need to dig down into the posts to perform moderation tasks?

I'm glad to hear you are not only liking jschan, but that you have also been exposed to other options so you know what works better and what sucks compared to others.

>>349
Yes, jschan does let you moderate from the overboard. It makes things a lot easier when you don't have to click multiple things in order to perform the task you need to. 

I'm glad I could help and if you have any other questions feel free to ask.

you.jpg
[Hide] (133.7KB, 794x807)

"Web 3.0" is shit.

And OP is a dumb nigger for thinking otherwise.

On most of the "Dark Web", both Tor and I2P, we're still "Web 1.0" masterrace.

>>330 (OP) 
I just wanted to say that while a chan might do alright with modern UI, it might also not do well. It'd depend on the functionality of the software behind that UI and the overall user experience, but that can also be influenced by whatever culture your site attracts. Modern UI isn't good necessarily because it's modern. Trends in UI design can proliferate based on profit and said profit can largely be based on what's easiest on the eyes.

The reason why minimalism, rounded corners along with muted colours or smooth animations have defined web design over the past decade is because they're seen as "safe" for corporations who want to maximise engagement - profit - and minimise potential aversion - losses.

Fuck that philosophy. It's not "good", it's just safe. That's all it is. The only reason it's caught on is because the majority of products in design are made and sold to consumers rather than given out or shared, and profit from those sales is really what the creators/distributors of said product are after. 

So it becomes the norm and retards think normation is a prescriptive force rather than a descriptive one, so they emulate it in mimicry like a child. Don't be like them >>330 (OP) .

>>341
BASED.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1t10VI-sccy1CfAeMZHwmCS_7agIHFo_B5ipMjzsMtTg/edit

I'm posting from Tor right now, lol.

An .onion address just makes it faster to connect, and adds more layers to make it even harder for the feds to run traffic analysis.

You fags are obviously pretty new, and don't really understand how Tor works.

1c8gn7.jpg
[Hide] (166.1KB, 1931x1855)

>>336

You guys come off as a small tight-knit community of retarded faggots, but this place is pretty comfy. 

I may stay a while.

33390e7c11222e5589199347572b3612d4cf5ece2aec8f7a344e4b21d7c70af2.png
[Hide] (210.1KB, 480x360)

>>338
Thanks, IHM has owned this board since 2008 and I married her and that defaulted me to being the sysadmin so it's pretty mom and pop as that sorta thing goes.

>>336
Nah, sorry. Word is some faggot mirrored our shit on an .onion back when we put the site back up so torfags once again ruin things for everyone.

For what its worth, IPs are cloaked in the backend by default and regularly pruned. The only time I do anything that could be considered looking at them is to see if it returns as Tor or "dicksuck cambodian DCH that nobody will care about being rangebanned for an arbitrary amount of time" for posting invite links to telegram slut clubs, but I assure you I smoke enough weed that I can barely keep track of what day it is much less every goddamn exit node that's already probably listed on like 300 different git repos

There are some exit nodes that get banned pretty regularly due to whoever has the botnet that posts degenerate shit along the lines of the long winded scenario referenced above and your typical handful of dedicated assholes, but generally you shouldn't have to cycle through too many routes in a given 24 hours

all that aside, the global rules are written to be easy to not fuck up so have fun if you decide to lurk

Blessed post

No.

>>324
I'm sure OP is some fucktard wanting the spam the site with cp.
Good on you homicide!

Thanks for spoilering the dix and gore on /b/

Thanks for spoilering the dix and gore on /b/

>>273

NP I wasn't sure whether to just ban or not, but yeah, that shit isn't going to fly here. Figure as a warning we would spoiler it first then start banning

>>273
>>274
I've been debating banning the gore but it wasn't like that gory if it makes sense and luckily no more has been posted. If it gets worse then yes I'm gonna ban it, that stuff is creepy.